|
 |
Am 30.09.2014 21:45, schrieb Shay:
> clipka <ano### [at] anonymous org> wrote:
>
>> I also think it quite healthy because it includes both reason /and/
>> emotion, and my guess is that this is exactly what most of us like best
>> about the atmosphere (do you say that in English?) of this newsgroup.
>
> This newsgroup is typical in that disagreement is "allowed" as long as *certain*
> assertions are not challenged.
>
> In the US currently, we can calmly argue over /how/ to deal with Isis, but
> nutcase.
>
> Similarly, in p.o-t we can calmly argue over the specifics of king-for-a-day
> the king-for-a-day premise itself is quickly, sharply admonished.
... whatever "king-for-a-day Progressivism" or "the king-for-a-day
premise" is.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
