Warp wrote:
> Saul Luizaga <sau### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>> BTW, calling something obscure when it's not is an argument from
>> ignorance, something that scientist won't suppose to do, right?
>
> I don't think you even understand what "argument from ignorance" means.
>
> Did you pull a random fallacy name from your behind?
>
No, that's what you think, I don't think you understand the comcept neither.

Post a reply to this message