On 8/21/2014 11:47 PM, scott wrote:
>> Umm. No, when I try it in Firefox its more like 4-5 minutes.
>
> :-O
>
> I don't remember the last time I had FF installed and it sounds like I
> won't be installing it again anytime soon.
>
Personally, I hate the lack of customizability in Chrome, and the basic 
lack of certain in-built features in it. Otherwise, it has some features 
for html5 that are not yet implemented any place else, which, if you 
wanted to use them, means they won't work in FF, and, some shaders 
depend on them too. But, really, as I said in another post, the problem 
generally only happens when large images/files that need to transfer, on 
the same page, like.. large animate gifs, or, shaders, which seem to 
thread badly, somehow, and probably for the same reasons. For 99.999% of 
the pages out there, they work more or less equally well. And, I won't 
give up the plugins I use in it, just for some stuff I rarely visit. lol

-- 
Commander Vimes: "You take a bunch of people who don't seem any 
different from you and me, but when you add them all together you get 
this sort of huge raving maniac with national borders and an anthem."

Post a reply to this message