On 7/26/2014 11:35 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> The point at which it's a problem for me is when someone's imposing their
> beliefs on someone else.  I despise SCOTUS' recent decision allowing a
> corporation to hold religious beliefs (say what?) and to impose those
> beliefs on their employees (in the form of not allowing their corporate-
> provided health care plan to cover certain forms of contraception,
> because the 'corporation' believes - inaccurately, I might add - that
> those drugs are 'sinful' because they cause abortions (which they don't)).
>
And, of course, despite the supposed "limited scope" of this, it took 
the lawyers less than 10 seconds to expand that to include every 
bullshit lawsuit currently in the works that involves a company having 
to accommodate **anything** hey didn't like, and SCOTUS less than 24 
hours to not only approve of at least some of those expansions, but to 
create one of their own.

But, its like.. limited, so, we don't really need to worry, and stuff..

-- 
Commander Vimes: "You take a bunch of people who don't seem any 
different from you and me, but when you add them all together you get 
this sort of huge raving maniac with national borders and an anthem."

Post a reply to this message