On Thu, 29 May 2014 05:33:02 +0200, clipka wrote:

> Am 29.05.2014 04:05, schrieb Jim Henderson:
>> On Wed, 28 May 2014 20:47:10 +0100, Doctor John wrote:
>>
>>> On 28/05/14 20:39, clipka wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Why, yes, of course we do. But what you forget is that while those
>>>> rules allow a challenge to be avoided by a continuation of the
>>>> sentence, such a continuation would have to come from a player
>>>> /other/
>>>> than the challanged. Besides, according to the Guildford
>>>> clarification of 2013 it would also have to be posted no later than
>>>> 31 minutes 41 seconds after the challenge.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> A masterful summation of Henderson's Variation. I had forgotten that
>>> the Guildford clarification was made in 2013.
>>
>> Forgetting that might require a forfeit be performed before you come
>> back from Knapp.
> 
> Fortunately for him he's not even there yet.

That does mean it'll be longer...Oh, I see, that is good for him. ;)

Jim



-- 
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and 
besides, the pig likes it." - George Bernard Shaw

Post a reply to this message