|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Am 29.05.2014 04:05, schrieb Jim Henderson:
> On Wed, 28 May 2014 20:47:10 +0100, Doctor John wrote:
>
>> On 28/05/14 20:39, clipka wrote:
>>>
>>> Why, yes, of course we do. But what you forget is that while those
>>> rules allow a challenge to be avoided by a continuation of the
>>> sentence, such a continuation would have to come from a player /other/
>>> than the challanged. Besides, according to the Guildford clarification
>>> of 2013 it would also have to be posted no later than 31 minutes 41
>>> seconds after the challenge.
>>>
>>>
>> A masterful summation of Henderson's Variation. I had forgotten that the
>> Guildford clarification was made in 2013.
>
> Forgetting that might require a forfeit be performed before you come back
> from Knapp.
Fortunately for him he's not even there yet.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |