> On 2001-5-15 22:40, Anton Sherwood wrote:
>> ... Meanwhile, another idea: if (dx,dy,dz) were replaced with
>> (dx+dy,dx+dz,dy+dz), the `crystal' would be a rhombic dodecahedron.

On 2014-2-07 20:45, Anton Sherwood wrote:
> Or not.  Less than 13 years later, as I was thinking about something
> unrelated to ray-tracing, it hit me that it would have to be
> 	(dx+dy, dx-dy, dx+dz, dx-dz, dy+dz, dy-dz).

Or ( abs(dx)+abs(dy), abs(dx)+abs(dz), abs(dy)+abs(dz) ),
which is probably what I meant in the first place.

-- 
*\\* Anton Sherwood *\\* www.bendwavy.org

Post a reply to this message