On 02/12/2014 02:04 AM, jhu wrote:
> James Holsenback <nom### [at] nonecom> wrote:
>> OK ... not what you expected ;-)
>>
>> Playing around with subsurface
>
> Nice.
>
> Now add focal blur and radiosity and report back the render time difference.
> Mwahahahaaaaaa!!!
>

Already done that ... with radiosity 47+ hrs and I didn't like the 
results. I used Radiosity_Fast with pretrace_end 0.004, count 256 and 
gray_threshold 1 /without/ sslt to gather the rad data. It looked pretty 
decent. The 2nd run with gathered rad data and sslt missed the mark :-( 
Is pre-gathered rad data a no-no in this case???

This version /tries/ to try to resolve with a 2nd fill light more 
reasonable render time ~15hrs

Obviously I still have some work to do!

Post a reply to this message