>Thomas de Groot  on date 03/02/2014 16.04 wrote:
> This version is better as the proportions of the original carpet have
> now been respected.
>
> Not really an issue, but an even better version would be obtained with
> an uv_mapped image_map on the height_field. However distortions from the
> folds of the height_field are hardly or not visible in the present image.
>
> Thomas
A flying carpet will soon be sold at Gancaloon's court...
;-)
Paolo

Post a reply to this message