Am 24.01.2014 07:03, schrieb Jim Henderson:

> I think what clipka is saying is that his rules apply to things relating
> to religious faith (or lack thereof), but that's not the only factor.
> Not wanting to be shot isn't a matter of faith, it's a matter of personal
> preference, so it's not covered by those rules.
>
> It seems to be constrained by the idea that if someone else's religious
> beliefs/faith aren't affecting me, it doesn't matter.  If it does, then
> it's not a matter of faith any more, then it's a matter of "effects in
> the real world that impact one personally" and a different set of
> guidelines apply.
>
> Have I understood you correctly, clipka?  I find it interesting.

Well, no - not exactly. See my other post.

Post a reply to this message