Am 23.01.2014 04:37, schrieb Patrick Elliott:
> On 1/21/2014 4:36 PM, clipka wrote:
>> Am 21.01.2014 20:50, schrieb Patrick Elliott:
>>> On 1/20/2014 5:44 PM, clipka wrote:
>>>
>>>> Note that a person's current belief re a surpreme something will
>>>> typically include that the person itself is entitled to "life, liberty
>>>> and the pursuit of happiness" or some such. Thus, I consider this

>>>>
>>> But, not necessarily that someone else is, if that someone else is
>>> violating some principle, derived from the idea that a supreme something
>>> is being violated, somehow.
>>

>> they have, but others' rights that /they/ think they have.
>>
> Hmm. Pretty sure its a valid concept to disrespect the right that
> someone else thinks they have, to say.. shoot me, or like.. a lot of
> other things. Seems to me that there is just.. a tiny flaw in the logic
> some place. ;)


paragraphs - derived not from the basic agnostic position but from the 
personal belief - have to kick in.

Post a reply to this message