On 1/21/2014 4:36 PM, clipka wrote:
> Am 21.01.2014 20:50, schrieb Patrick Elliott:
>> On 1/20/2014 5:44 PM, clipka wrote:
>>
>>> Note that a person's current belief re a surpreme something will
>>> typically include that the person itself is entitled to "life, liberty
>>> and the pursuit of happiness" or some such. Thus, I consider this

>>>
>> But, not necessarily that someone else is, if that someone else is
>> violating some principle, derived from the idea that a supreme something
>> is being violated, somehow.
>

> they have, but others' rights that /they/ think they have.
>
Hmm. Pretty sure its a valid concept to disrespect the right that 
someone else thinks they have, to say.. shoot me, or like.. a lot of 
other things. Seems to me that there is just.. a tiny flaw in the logic 
some place. ;)


-- 
Commander Vimes: "You take a bunch of people who don't seem any 
different from you and me, but when you add them all together you get 
this sort of huge raving maniac with national borders and an anthem."

Post a reply to this message