|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 1/16/2014 2:12 AM, clipka wrote:
> Why not? Is there any reason to be unimpressed by someone having
> acquired the skill to solve certain types of puzzles? Is it pointless?
> No more so than the skill to kick a ball into a rectangular frame I
> suspect: Both, as a side effect, tend to also make you good at other
> things that /can/ be of practical value.
>
Well, at least that implies some "skill". As an aside, there was some
post or other, which was reposted on a blog I read, which broke down
what goes on in "American Football", in terms of time spent. This was
the break down:
45 minutes of commercials.
83 minutes of people standing around talking (I think it was like 37
minutes of that which was couches, and other non-players doing that).
11 minutes of actual play time.
15 minutes of replays.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |