On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 21:08:22 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 12/01/2014 8:21 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Well, yes, it is, except when the above two rules are in effect.  Cite:
>> "NF Stovold’s Mornington Crescent: Rules and Origins," page 3,642,
>> paragraph 3, clause 4.
>>
>>
> But not, when they aren't.
> 
> It is true what they say. No sense of timing. :-P
> 
>>> >The only advisory clause is the third party interjection, one. Which
>>> >should be obvious but it is needed to confirm the penalties heaped
>>> >upon
>>> >   the said third party.
>> Except when the third party is correct in his challenge. :P
> 
> Especially, if the third party is correct in his challenge

It seems that you're agreeing with me. :)

Jim
-- 
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and 
besides, the pig likes it." - George Bernard Shaw

Post a reply to this message