On 12/01/2014 8:21 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> Well, yes, it is, except when the above two rules are in effect.  Cite:
> "NF Stovold’s Mornington Crescent: Rules and Origins," page 3,642,
> paragraph 3, clause 4.
>

But not, when they aren't.

It is true what they say. No sense of timing. :-P

>> >The only advisory clause is the third party interjection, one. Which
>> >should be obvious but it is needed to confirm the penalties heaped upon
>> >   the said third party.
> Except when the third party is correct in his challenge. :P

Especially, if the third party is correct in his challenge

-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message