On 05/01/14 22:02, Le_Forgeron wrote:
> Le 05/01/2014 22:27, Doctor John nous fit lire :
>> TRANSACTION1 is the initial payment to the bank. TRANSACTION2 is a later
>> payment by a bank* to an actor; it therefore requires a different date
>> (usually but not always specified) as well as a way of specifying where
>> it will be enacted.
> 
> So, what about calling T1 as Credit/Credence, and T2 as Debit/Restitution.
> 

But that's just nitpicking. The planned views do not have to be named
after the tables.

I still ask though, regardless of names, does it look sane?

BTW Andrew, your lecturer was a pathetic pedant

John
-- 
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children

Post a reply to this message