clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> > Microsoft is traditionally known for software of questionable quality
> > (especially on the operating system side, even though they have improved
> > in this section since the integrated their NT line into their desktop line)
> > and their dubious competitive tactics, especially in the past (eg.
> > basically extorting PC vendors to include their OS in all sold machines).

> I won't fully agree with this statement; their primary software 
> development product has been demonstrating exceptionally high quality 
> (at least by MS standards) for a decade or more (except for the 
> documentation).

You "won't fully agree", yet you are agreeing. I said: "even though they
have improved in this section since the integrated their NT line into
their desktop line."

When did this happen? A decade ago (with XP and the bunch of updates to
it that came soon after.)

XP is their first desktop OS that can *barely* be called an actual
operating system.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message