Am 15.12.2013 02:22, schrieb Doctor John:
> On 15/12/13 01:06, clipka wrote:
>> I won't fully agree with this statement; their primary software
>> development product has been demonstrating exceptionally high quality
>> (at least by MS standards) for a decade or more (except for the
>> documentation).
>>
>
> May I point out your words "at least by MS standards"

Sure, if you let me not only point out but also emphasize the words 
"/exceptionally/" and "/at least/". The only reason I added "(at least 
by MS standards)" is that I really can't say how it compares to, say, 
IBM's Rational line of products. But extrapolating from my experience 
with a small subset of the Rational tools - and other mind-bogglingly 
expensive development tools, for that matter - I'd expect MS Visual 
Studio to win by lengths.

> and "except for the documentation?

Yeah, because the docs really don't do the product /per se/ any justice. 
But I've yet to see a software development product where that is /not/ 
the case.

Post a reply to this message