On 12-12-2013 15:10, Fractracer wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>> On 12-12-2013 12:21, Fractracer wrote:
>>
>> And yet, I cannot hide humility in front of the true masters and trying
>> to learn from them :-)
>>
>>
>> Time will learn. I sometimes wonder how the electronic arts will be
>> judged by future generations.
>>
>> Thomas
>
> The technics of graphims evolve, electronic arts are one of the many evolutions.
> In this actual century a lot of artistics technics are used that never been
> before (cutting, collage, hyper-realistics painting - take a look at this page:
>
http://dailygeekshow.com/2013/09/12/16-artistes-talentueux-qui-vont-vous-faire-croire-que-leurs-oeuvres-sont-des-photog
> raphies-mais-il-nen-est-rien/
> some painting seems like ray-tracing images (use of reflected spheres).

Yes, that is incredible stuff indeed, reminiscent of the 'Photorealism' 
artistic movement that started in the US in the 1970's. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photorealism

> I think technics used inspiration in other technics. And I believe the
> electronics arts will be accepted like a whole art.
> Actually how many artists (I means people who make creations), we live a time
> with a incredible flow of creations. But in older times, for one master we know,
> how many others painters? For one Van Gogh, how many painters unknown.
>

Absolutely.

Thomas

Post a reply to this message