On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 17:21:24 -0500, Shay wrote:

> I answered your questions, Jim. Both of them. Only after pointing out
> the inferences loaded into them, but I did answer them. You'll do
> anything to avoid actual discussion of this topic. It's transparent.
> 
> I don't know if you spend your days surrounded by children or idiots who
> fall for that kind of crap, or if you just *think* you do. But I've laid
> out my case plainly enough for anyone willing to learn from it.

I'm not going to debate this with you any more, Shay.  Trying to make the 
argument now that "Jim's too stupid to understand what I'm saying" isn't 
making your case any stronger.

I'm more than happy to discuss the topic, but only in a reasonable, 
rational, and respectful manner.

So when you're ready to do that, then let me know.

Jim

Post a reply to this message