|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Mon, 09 Sep 2013 19:14:46 -0700, Patrick Elliott wrote:
> Oh, and.. more to the point, now that they have something semi-decent,
What, you mean MS Security Essentials? You think a /reactive/ tool is
semi-decent? One that isn't based on behaviour, but based on pattern
matching?
> they still block networking tools why? Its not like the botnet code is
> going to, unless there is something fatally wrong with their "solution",
Which there is - it's REACTIVE, not PROACTIVE or BEHAVIOURAL in nature.
The best types of behavioural technology are things like AppArmor and
SELinux, but those actually require a fair amount of expertise and skill
to set up - there isn't an "out of the box" configuration that works for
everyone, and it's not something your grandmother is going to be able to
set up reasonably.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |