On 9/3/2013 11:09 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 10:06:35 -0700, Patrick Elliott wrote:
>
>> The number of "botnets" around hasn't changes much, like, at all, so,
>> the whole entirely reason for putting such a filter in, in the first
>> place, is totally meaningless, which makes having it.. what? A good
>> idea? lol
>
> That's like saying that not everyone follows the law, so we should get
> rid of all laws.
>
> Jim
>
Its more like insisting that you build walls around the city, and place 
armed guards at each entry, on the theory that it will stop you from 
being invaded, while the "invaders", have.. tanks, bombers, cruise 
missiles..

What is the point of a law that can't be enforced? Its different if it 
can be. But, if all it does is turn your computer into the TSA...

Post a reply to this message