|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 9/2/2013 9:44 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> It doesn't really seem reasonable to me to hold the OS producer
> responsible for not being able to do - as you call it - "semi-abnormal
> things".
>
> If the filter is behavioural, then of course it can't tell the difference
> between a diagnostic tool and actual malicious traffic. Tell me, how
> would *you* code the software to tell the difference between
> "legitimately" wonky behaviour, and actually malicious behaviour?
>
> Jim
>
The number of "botnets" around hasn't changes much, like, at all, so,
the whole entirely reason for putting such a filter in, in the first
place, is totally meaningless, which makes having it.. what? A good
idea? lol
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |