|
|
On 08/20/2013 02:02 PM, Anthony D. Baye wrote:
>
> More often than not, one side will be bigger than the other. That is all the
> process requires.
>
> The way you're doing it, you should at the very least make your factor a random
> amount.
>
> From the page where I got the idea, it looks like he may be using a constant
> value but randomly choosing whether to shrink or expand.
>
> still, I think the process will work as I've stated.
>
> Regards,
> A.D.B.
>
I don't know which method is better because each relies on one or more
random streams. The best way to figure that out is to run a series of tests.
--
Cheers
Ger
Post a reply to this message
|
|