|
|
On 14/08/2013 10:56 PM, Shay wrote:
> When Steve started the tc-rtc, I suggested he go to a single-score system.
> Steve chose to keep the three-score system, and, with apologies to my dear,
> departed friend, THAT SUCKS. Why does it suck?
I had a few discussions with him too, a few over pints. :-) I thought
that a weighting system might be more fair. Possibly because I too like
to push the boundaries and not be obvious. But he wanted to keep it as
similar to the IRTC competitions as possible. But now that Thomas and I
have the site developer's attention. The scoring is up for discussion.
Personally, I think that Technical is suspect too. I mean how can you
tell and why is it important?
> Well, back when this round
[snip]
> We won't see them because people have learned that "stressed topics" are instantly
> dismissed.
>
Shame that. :-(
> I can't change how people vote--I'm certain I'll be "dinged" for
> concept--but I can enter a "losing" entry anyway and at least take part.
My thoughts on all my entries.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|