On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:30:24 -0700, Patrick Elliott wrote:

> ... Right.. Because it was so clear this is what was being talked about.
> Seriously though.. At the bare minimum, I would say, if you plan to not
> put pressure on other nations to do something sane, then you need to
> make sure you a) never have anyone sneaking in, b) your own people *are*
> vaccinated, and c) that to even enter the country "requires" they meet
> the same basic medical requirements to even get in.

The problem here is that you're aiming for a 100% solution.  But nothing 
is ever 100% certain - that's life.

As evidenced by the current state of "homeland security" in US airports.

When you get to 100% security, you have no freedom.  So you have to 
balance the two, and the debate is about finding the right balance.

Jim

Post a reply to this message