clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> > If you could go back in time, and had the power, would you have stopped
> > those semi-forced vaccinations from taking place, risking smallpox not
> > being completely eradicated, with the subsequent deaths up to this day?

> Yes, I might have done that. I might have taken that risk; note that a 
> risk is something that may or may not happen.

So, how many lives would you consider an acceptable loss in the name of
respecting people's freedom of choice? How many deaths would be necessary
before you would change your opinion and accept forced vaccinations?
A hundred? A thousand? A million? How many would you sacrifice?

Do you understand why I find this whole conversation so nauseating?

> > People here are comparing forced vaccination programs to totalitarianism
> > and eugenics. However, a better comparison would be mandatory elementary
> > education.

> No. Education doesn't normally put your health at any risk.

I don't even understand how you can completely reverse the notion of
saving the lives of millions of people into the notion of putting lives
at risk. That's completely backwards.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message