On 10-8-2013 19:26, Warp wrote:
> andrel <byt### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>> On 10-8-2013 1:28, Warp wrote:
>>> andrel <byt### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>>>> On 9-8-2013 22:57, Warp wrote:
>>>
>>>>> By your logic someone robbing someone else is "a totalitarian regime".
>>>>> Which makes absolutely no sense.
>>>
>>>> Ah, it is good to see the great strawman-master at work again.
>>>> Well done.
>>>
>>> Yes,
>
>> Indeed so stop with that.
>
>> And everything below is totally irrelevant to my remark.
>> Learn how to debate and stick to the subject.
>
> You are trying to convince me to "stop with that" by cutting the first
> word of my reply and making a smartass remark about it, without even
> trying to resond to what I actually said?
>
> How about I don't?
>

"Yes" was sufficient the rest was irrelevant, because it had nothing to 
do with what I said. It was nothing more than a childish 'he did it too 
;( ' and that was not true either.

For me there was and is no point in going into a debate with you on what 
totalitarian means or not, because, again, it is irrelevant for the 
discussion. I have said elsewhere why vaccination 'by force' won't work. 
If you have anything useful to add to that, be my guest.

-- 
Everytime the IT department forbids something that a researcher deems
necessary for her work there will be another hole in the firewall.

Post a reply to this message