|
 |
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 14:00:07 -0400, Warp wrote:
> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>> Look at it from the standpoint of the people you're trying to force to
>> take the injection. They don't know that it's not an experiment, or
>> that you know what you're talking about.
>
> So what? Neither does an unconscious person. Would you refuse to save
> the life of an unconscious person because they are unable to understand
> what you are doing to them?
Different situation entirely, and you know it.
>> > Let me put it this way: If there were a country out there that
>> > regularly engages in ritual sacrifice of humans, would you want to
>> > intervene?
>
>> Yes. That is different than telling someone "I know what's good for
>> you and you will submit to it because I say so". To pretend that those
>> are even remotely similar situations is patently ridiculous.
>
> Says the person who compares giving a vaccine to someone to a
> totalitarian regime.
It is if you go out, grab them, stick them with a needle and pump
something in them that they only have your word on being good for them.
>> I also reject the bullshit analogy you use to justify this - equating
>> something that is clearly immoral and just plain wrong (human
>> sacrifice) with imposing a totalitarian regime on someone because you
>> know better than they do is not the same thing.
>
> Please, by all means explain to me how giving a vaccine to someone,
> saving their life, is imposing a totalitarian regime onto them. I would
> be interested to hear.
Have you ever tried to put yourself in someone else's shoes? You should
try it sometime.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
