On 8-8-2013 16:15, clipka wrote:
> Am 08.08.2013 13:38, schrieb Thomas de Groot:

>> Also, I am not too
>> sure about the dof in that case. Too extreme for my taste.
>
> I guess you're right. Then again, the acceptable dof might also depend
> on how detailed the background is.
>
It is mostly the out-of-focus part of the figure itself that I question. 
With a more detailed background, I would prefer the figure to be sharp 
front to back, or maybe only a little out of focus in the farthest part.

Thomas

Post a reply to this message