Am 08.08.2013 13:38, schrieb Thomas de Groot:
> On 8-8-2013 13:11, clipka wrote:
>> Two more versions. I'm not sure which lighting setup I like better - but
>> I do know that I'd really love to have MCPov's "render until I'm ok with
>> the noise" mode of operation right now... and/or faster SSLT, for that
>> matter.
>>
> I would prefer the first (0925) maybe with a tiny bit more fill-in on
> the right. The other one is a bit too flat to me.

Surprisingly enough, the first one uses a HDR light probe of an overcast 
sky (albeit in a park with some trees around, so there is /some/ 
uniformity to the illumination), while the latter one uses a light probe 
of a clear sky. (I suspect the creator of the probe didn't include a 
shot with a short enough exposure time to capture the true brightness of 
the sun; I'll try again with an added light.)

> Also, I am not too
> sure about the dof in that case. Too extreme for my taste.

I guess you're right. Then again, the acceptable dof might also depend 
on how detailed the background is.

Post a reply to this message