|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> Sure it does:
>
> 45 - 15 = 30
>
> 180 - 60 = 120
>
> 120 > 30
>
> The factor isn't the important thing, the disparity is the important
> thing.
The problem is if you try and keep the arithmetic difference constant,
whilst still allowing economic growth, the "bell curve" of income will
get narrower and narrower until everyone is earning essentially the
same. I don't know whether that's a good idea or not, but that's the
only option to allow what you are arguing for.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |