|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Am 19.07.2013 23:38, schrieb Nekar Xenos:
>> As an aside, a notion of "complex Infinity" is actually extremely
>> useful in some areas mathematics. Arguably much more useful than
>> "real Infinity" is. The standard definition of complex Infinity does
>> not allow Infinity+Infinity though (it treats it as undefined, much
>> like 1/0 is commonly treated as undefined for the reals).
>>
> I imagined the complex set would have a larger "density" if you could
> call it that. (Real numbers would have a larger "density" than integers)
No, the set of complex numbers is just "as infinite" as the set of real
numbers; you can use a digit-interleaving technique similar to that
which gets you from the natural numbers to all of the integers.
> So if I have this right
> Infinity + Infinity = Infinity
> is correct for real numbers and not for complex numbers.
If you mean
Infinity := (number of elements in the set of complex numbers)
then no, Infinity + Infinity = Infinity still holds there.
I guess what he meant was that some
ComplexInfinity := an infinite that behaves much like a
complex number, and possibly even has
a representation of the form (a + bi)
for some presumably weird choice of a,b
Gives you
ComplexInfinity + ComplexInfinity = <undefined>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |