>> boost::shared_ptr<std::vector<Foo>> _foo(new std::vector<Foo>());
>>
>> I don't see how the >> is ambiguous at all in this statement. Seems to
>> me like lazy/bad parser design if this trips it up.
>
> It's not quite so cut and dry as you might guess.  For example:
...
>      cout << (boost::shared_ptr<std::vector<Foo>> _foo(NULL)) << endl;

Is that ambiguous?

Post a reply to this message