|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Le 27/01/2013 23:28, Jim Henderson a écrit :
>> From what I've seen, several revision control systems *claim* to
>> support large binary files, but barf if you actually try it...
>
> subversion seems to handle them fine, FWIW. I've seen it used to handle
> multiple revisions of multiple-gigabyte vmdk files without a problem.
> It's not terribly efficient at non-text files (it doesn't diff them, it
> just stores each revision of the entire file).
>
> I've also seen it used for binary FrameMaker files extensively, and it
> versions those fine as well (though with the same caveat).
Yes, svn is fine... as long as no-one activate the keywords substitution
on the binary file (and a binary file can be a word document) (and hell
opens with keywords set on, when Murphy put a $Rev$ or similar in the
binary)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |