|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 01/23/2013 10:41 AM, Le_Forgeron wrote:
> Le 23/01/2013 16:09, Cousin Ricky a écrit :
>> for Linux is most emphatically that RAID must not be used as a primary
>> backup system.
>
> If you expect RAID to cover failure, you would be in for deception.
/generally/ speaking that would be false, but yep I agree with you on
this, as I've seen failures involving two different mechanisms and
recovery was problematic ... worst case scenario who be a failure that
also involved loss of the parity compressed data. In a /perfect/ world
RAID5 is a valid option.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |