|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
clipka <ano### [at] anonymous org> wrote:
> Am 17.01.2013 13:19, schrieb Thomas de Groot:
> > This might end the controversy:
> >
> >
http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/creative-suite-2-activation-end-life.html
> >
> >
> > ...or not? ;-)
> "While it could be interpreted as Adobe giving away software for free,
> Adobe did it to help its customers."
> So they do explicitly acknowledge that this interpretation is possible,
> and they're not explicitly saying that it is wrong; they're just saying
> that it wasn't their primary motivation.
You are reading between the lines. "They are not explicitly saying that
the interpretation is wrong", therefore the interpretation is correct?
To me "while it could be interpreted" means quite unambiguously "that
interpretation is incorrect." Else they would say that it is correct.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |