POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : How is this even possible? : Re: How is this even possible? Server Time
29 Jul 2024 06:22:55 EDT (-0400)
  Re: How is this even possible?  
From: Patrick Elliott
Date: 22 Dec 2012 03:30:32
Message: <50d56fa8$1@news.povray.org>
On 12/20/2012 1:59 PM, Stephen wrote:
> On 20/12/2012 3:46 PM, Warp wrote:
>> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>>>> They dropped that
>>>> particular commandment.
>>
>>> News to me.
>>
>> The second commandment according to the Catholic church (as well as the
>> Lutheran one, which adopted this from the former) is not "you shall not
>> make a carved image", but "you shall not take the name of the Lord your
>> God in vain."
>>
>
> Comparing Jewish, RC & Proddy: It seems to me that Christians could not
> use the Jewish first commandment as they had not been delivered out of
> bondage from the Egyptians so the RCs split the verses about coveting
> into two and the Proddies added the one about graven images to get at
> the Catholics.

Except, of course, they where not. The only evidence of Semites "in" 
Egypt, ever, is several hundred years earlier, when they temporarily 
ruled it, then got their asses kicked out. None of the dates, based on 
the Bible, line up with any pharaoh that could have done it. There is no 
evidence of mass famine, the loss of most of the male population of 
Eqypt (they would have either died in the army, or as "first born" 
during the plagues), no sign of them being attacked by their enemies 
during any time period it could have happened, based on the chronology, 
etc. Worse, there is evidence of his "people" having had settlements, 
for centuries, in the areas they supposedly wandered only 40 years (and 
its not even the right 40 years, but like.. again *prior* to the 
supposed Exodus.

Of course, Christians had no way of knowing this, since they where 
basing it all on the same mythology. Of course, there is always the 
possibility that they did know, and a lot of the NT was scripted 
"specifically" to attempt to replace the OT, and, in the process, 
justify Roman attempts to rule over, and control Jewish lands, which 
they had been spending decades trying, not entirely successfully, to 
conquer. How much better to undermine their religion, than to conquest 
them via an ineffective war.


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.