|
 |
On 12/16/2012 12:37 AM, Warp wrote:
> Patrick Elliott <kag### [at] gmail com> wrote:
>> Well, now, see... None of those things have magic powers, include an
>> afterlife, or even vaguely refer to sound theological concepts, so,
>> sorry, you're not qualified. Same way even if you read every book of
>> apologistics in existence, you would have still a) not read the one that
>> qualifies you to speak of the matter, or b) like.. didn't read them all
>> properly, or something. Yeah, that's it. You didn't read them right, so
>> you're not qualified. ;)
>
> How could I even follow a constitutional law that doesn't even explain
> what it means?
>
lol Well, the point of the above is that this is precisely how "Biblical
law" seems to work. So, given the reason some of them object to liberal
interpretations of the constitution, I can only assume its how they
think "it" should work too. ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
