On 12/12/2012 10:21 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:45:58 -0800, Patrick Elliott wrote:
>
>> Because, being a citizen and/or resident of the state, for some damn
>> reason, doesn't qualify you as "having standing".
>
> Well, no, it depends on whether or not you can demonstrate that you are
> harmed by that law.  That's one of the questions before SCOTUS with the
> Prop 8 case out of California - do those who appealed even have standing
> to appeal?  General wisdom is no, they don't, because they're not harmed
> by Judge Walker's ruling.
>
> Jim
>
Uh, yeah.. And, they get to define what ever the F "harm" is, and isn't, 
more or less.

Post a reply to this message