|
 |
Am 12.12.2012 18:45, schrieb Warp:
> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>> Any law can be passed, it's up to someone who wouldn't meet the criteria
>> to challenge it in court.
>
> But I thought the whole idea of a constitution is that anticonstitutional
> laws can *not* be passed.
Well, I guess it's a matter of taste, whether a constitution should
prevent *passing* an anticonstitutional law, or whether it should
prevent *enforcing* such a law.
It seems that Europe favors the former flavor, whether America favors
the latter.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
