|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 21:40:55 +0000, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>>> It may be too early to say, but the WTF quotient of my new employer
>>> appears to be significantly lower than my previous one. I mean,
>>> there's still some minor brokenness there. But it's not like the last
>>> bunch of losers I worked for, where the company was run by deranged
>>> howler monkeys.
>>
>> It's good that you are seeing that what many of us told you for so long
>> is in fact true - not all employers are as odd as the one you just
>> left. :)
>
> Or rather, I had assumed that I was working for *the only* broken
> company. But now it appears that each company is broken, it's just a
> question of how seriously or trivially.
All companies face challenges, certainly. People are involved.
>> Spotify is great, subscribed recently myself - very large catalog of
>> music, not all of it is as annoying as Gangnam Style or "other terrible
>> music."
>
> I think my boss just likes trolling people, BTH. ;-)
>
>> And yes, it is legal - you pay a monthly fee and get access to what's
>> in their catalog.
>
> But not Pink Floyd or The Beatles, apparently... And yet, at the same
> time, unknown bands like The Senti-Mentals are there. Very odd.
It's called "licensing fees", and some of the very popular bands (and
their labels) want extortionate fees to be included in the catalog.
But I did find some Floyd on Slacker, another similar service that I also
subscribe too.
>
>> Think Netflix or Lovefilm for music.
>
> Ah yes - two other services that I don't yet understand...
What's to understand? I want to watch a movie, it's in their catalog, I
stream it to my PS3 and watch it. I pay a monthly fee and can stream as
much as I want.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |