|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 07/11/2012 8:07 PM, Warp wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aol com> wrote:
>> On 07/11/2012 7:44 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> You'd think so, but many people seem to think that their belief and
>>> ignorance trumps actual knowledge.
>
>> That is what faith means. I believe it without proof. A plus in some
>> quarters, I believe.
>
> Why is it that in many religions (and also in many superstitious belief
> systems)
Is there a difference? (I am not being funny.)
faith is considered a virtue? And they are explicitly referring
> to believing without actual proof or evidence. They talk as if proof would
> diminish and soil the value of the belief, and that the less proof you
> have, the better!
That is how I see it too.
>
> (Of course this is a defense mechanism that has naturally formed that
> keeps superstitious beliefs alive, but I just can't understand why people
> swallow it so easily.)
>
I think that there are two reasons (at least).
1/ No one wants to stop existing when they die so the believe in a
religion that promises life after death.
2/ A lot of people find it hard to "think outside of the box" and
believe what they are brought up with as a matter of course.
3/ Lots of people are really STUPID! (Did I say that out loud?)
BTW I think that the talk in this thread (not you) where some people
discuss just how intelligent/wise you should be before you should be
allowed to vote, is marching to the sound of the Goose step.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |