|
 |
On 6-11-2012 21:43, clipka wrote:
> Am 06.11.2012 21:17, schrieb MichaelJF:
>>> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degroot org> wrote:
>>>> (3) average the blurred object image
>>>> with the scene image.
>>
>> Second thought: average the images with the transparent background and
>> layer the
>> result over the original scene only. Otherwise the original scene
>> (background)
>> has a chance to come into the object in motion. Ok, may be only to a
>> small,
>> hardly visible amount...
>
> No, you're perfectly right there: averaging is the wrong operation for
> this job; you do want an overlay operation.
>
Hmm yes. That is true. Not as straightforward as I thought. And if some
element of the scene partly obscures the moving object both techniques
won't work correctly. But otherwise an overlay would do.
We still need a megapov-type piece of code in the software.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
