On 11/06/2012 10:11 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 6-11-2012 16:04, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> Semantic trouble  :-)
>>
>> This is what I mean: It should /not/ be the full image. The commands do
>> not work. While +SR0.n and +ER0.n work correctly.
>>
>
> I am still not making myself clear enough.
>
> +Sn, +S0.n, +En, +E0.n are /unexisting/ commands which should be removed
> from the list at the start of the paragraph.
>
> Thomas
>
well at this point I'm not 100% sure ... given what else I've 
discovered. I'm just saying ... is there a chance that those variants 
ARE legit ... parser doesn't seem to care.

Post a reply to this message