Am 04.11.2012 20:46, schrieb MichaelJF:
> Yes, your proposal is much more detailed than mine. In fact I only mentioned the
> general idea that simply averaging pictures of a flight will not yield a motion
> blurred picture and proper weights are needed.
As a matter of fact, for /realistic/ motion blur simple averaging of the
images /is/ the proper method. Whike the "opaque object with transparent
trail" look is a common staple - probably invented to give the
impression of motion while at the same time preserving object detail -
it is outright wrong.
Post a reply to this message
|