|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote:
> I prefer the Sing# method, wherein if you have a variable that needs to be
> tracked, and you let it go out of scope without disposing it, the code
> doesn't compile.
Why? Since the compiler can track when the object goes out of scope, it
can just as easily automatically add the destructor call. Why burden the
programmer with that task? It doesn't make any sense.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |