|
 |
> andrel <byt### [at] gmail com> wrote:
>> I don't think so. I didn't know but apparently the equivalent of 'that
>> looks shopped' is I can see from the pixels' for audio is 'that sounds
>> AutoTuned, I can hear from the spectrum'.
>
> I don't know the exact algorithm for autotuning, but it wouldn't surprise
> me if it didn't leave some characteristic revealing marks or patterns in
> the sound that could be analyzed to see if it has been autotuned. (After
> all, pitch correction while retaining the correct timing requires more
> than just playing the sample faster or slower.)
>
It depends on the amount of autotuning required. If you only correct a
musician that's off by half a tone, it will probably be very difficult
to find, but it really sounds metallic when it's overdone (e.g.: those
"autotune the news" Youtube videos.
--
/*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
/* flabreque */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
/* @ */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
/* gmail.com */}camera{orthographic location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a }
Post a reply to this message
|
|
