|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>>> Or if it's a base for multiple linked clones where you started from a
>>> common base, but the clones are different.
>>
>> Then wouldn't each clone have its own local cloned disk image?
>
> Again, no. That's not what a linked clone is.
>
> I might be inclined to suggest "RTFM", as the VirtualBox and VMware
> documentation both describe what a linked clone is. Rather than assume
> what it is and then make statements based on those assumptions, you could
> actually learn what the idea is behind it.
Oh, so now you're claiming that I don't know how VMware works?
When you create a VM, it starts with one file for the disk image. Each
time you take a snapshot, it stops writing to the current image file,
and creates a new file which is a delta against the previous one. When
you make a "full clone", it copies all the data. When you create a
"linked clone", it creates a new VM, but it's base disk image is just a
delta against the linked VM, just like a snapshot.
I don't know off the top of my head how Virtual Box does it.
I'm still not seeing why you would want to transfer a disk from one VM
to another - except perhaps, as you say, for data transfer (if you can't
get a more sane method to work).
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |