>> And you keep asserting that Haskell is a bad language, without much
>> evidence either. :-P
>
> Nobody is asserting THAT.
>
> What we're talking about is that Haskell, Erlang and C# are each good
> languages for DIFFERENT types of problems.

That different languages solve different problems are hardly a 
contentious assertion - more like a verified FACT.

What I take issue with is the claim that for a language to be useful for 
anything it MUST be complex and badly designed.

Post a reply to this message